Cases 1 - 10 of 203
Robert Crenshaw v. Staton Healthcare Service, et al
as 24-10859
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES CRENSHAW
Defendant:
STATON HEALTHCARE SERVICE and ELLIS
Crenshaw v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Marion County)
as 5:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Joseph Crenshaw
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Crenshaw v. Staton Healthcare Service, et al
as 24-10338
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES CRENSHAW
Defendant:
STATON HEALTHCARE SERVICE and ELLIS
Robert Crenshaw v. Staton Healthcare Service, et al
as 24-10250
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES CRENSHAW
Defendant:
STATON HEALTHCARE SERVICE and ELLIS
Cottongim et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
Franklin Cottongim, Kyle Allen Cadwallader, Keith Calhoun and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crenshaw v. QBE Specialty Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv02336
Plaintiff:
Eric Crenshaw
Defendant:
QBE Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract
CRENSHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28828
Plaintiff:
BYRON CRENSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRENSHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18804
Plaintiff:
EUGENE CRENSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRENSHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17712
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CRENSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pace v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
Ocie Lee Pace, Jr
Defendant:
Todd Jones, Jessica L Blume, Angel Perez-Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
