Cases 1 - 10 of 9,142
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. State of Florida
as 6:2024cv01131
Petitioner:
Lawrence Allen Davis
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jane Doe I et al v. The Gentleman's Club, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe I, Jane Doe II, Jane Doe III and others
Defendant:
The Gentleman's Club, Inc. and William Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
v. FITZGERALD et al
as 5:2024cv00190
Defendant:
DEWAYNE RENARD FITZGERALD, STATE COURT OF BIBB COUNTY, SHARELL F LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Larry Davis Long, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Barton v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Davis Barton
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02642
Petitioner:
Patrick James Davis
Respondent:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Allen
as 1:2024cv02643
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Davis
Defendant:
Levon Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Clayton County Jail/Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv02644
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Davis
Defendant:
Clayton County Jail/Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Stokes et al
as 6:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Semiya Tahira Davis
Defendant:
Brain D. Stokes, Andrew Asher Bain and Dr. Andrea Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
