Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Clark v. Anti-Defamation League et al
as 1:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Tamah Jada Clark
Defendant:
Anti-Defamation League, Jonathan Greenblatt, B'nai B'rith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01843
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Richardson v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv01909
Petitioner:
Stevevanus Richardson
Respondent:
Anthony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Thomas E. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Ottley v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv01918
Petitioner:
Dante Jevon Ericson Ottley
Respondent:
Anthony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Thomas E. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Horvath v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv01413
Petitioner:
Alexander Horvath
Respondent:
Anthony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Michael S. Yeager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Hasan et al v. Blinken et al
as 8:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Inshirah H. Hasan and Omran M.Z. Hasan
Defendant:
Anthony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur M. Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
