Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Parks v. Esty et al
as 3:2020cv01233
Defendant: Esty, D. Spradley and R. Nelson
Plaintiff: Bernard Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv18799
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT BERNARD PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cordial Endeavor Concessions of Atlanta, LLC et al v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2018cv01973
Plaintiff: Cordial Endeavor Concessions of Atlanta, LLC and Shelia Edwards
Defendant: City of Atlanta , Mohammed K. Reed , Xpresspa Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
In re: Luther Parks
as 16-12869
Petitioner: In re: LUTHER BERNARD PARKS
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Parks v. Flournoy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00038
Petitioner: Luther Bernard Parks
Respondent: J.V. Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PARKS v. OVERSTREET We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00327
Plaintiff: BERNARD PARKS
Defendant: MICHAEL C OVERSTREET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS v. OVERSTREET et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00045
Plaintiff: BERNARD PARKS
Defendant: MICHAEL C OVERSTREET, ROBERT D SALE, E R MANN, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKS v. BAY COUNTY JAIL
as 5:2013cv00407
Plaintiff: BERNARD PARKS
Defendant: BAY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv01778
Petitioner: Luther Bernard Parks
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PARKS v. MCKEITHEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00117
Plaintiff: BERNARD PARKS
Defendant: FRANK MCKEITHEN and RICK ANGLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?