Cases 1 - 10 of 262
AMMONS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 5:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY AMMONS, IV
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and BIBB COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DAVIS
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
WILLIE DANTE SMITH
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. MACON BIBB COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 5:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
DESMOND LEE BROWN
Defendant:
MACON BIBB COUNTY GOVERNMENT and SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mcelroy v. The Bibb County Health Care Authority
as 7:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Astrid Mcelroy
Defendant:
The Bibb County Health Care Authority doing business as Bibb Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
AMMONS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 5:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY AMMONS, IV
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramiro Contreras v. Bibb County CF Warden
as 24-10996
Petitioner:
RAMIRO DELREAL CONTRERAS
Respondent:
BIBB COUNTY CF WARDEN
Lillie Middlebrooks v. City of Macon - Bibb County Georgia, et al
as 24-10705
Plaintiff:
LILLIE M. MIDDLEBROOKS
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON - BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA, ERICA L. WOODFORD, TAMIKA BURNETT and others
ROOKS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF BIBB COUNTY, JUDGE HOWARD Z SIMMS and ADA DOROTHY V HULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. LONG
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
GLEN SPEARING MATTHEWS
Defendant:
ROBERT R LONG, HARRY J FOX, JR, JOHN FRANCISCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
