Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Donald Cokely v. Lucretia Battles Smith, et al
as 24-10738
Plaintiff: DONALD CHADWICK COKELY
Defendant: LUCRETIA BATTLES SMITH, DRAKE THORNTON and STEDMAN SCOTT
Fowler et al v. Bluestone Coke LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01418
Plaintiff: Randal Fowler and Rickie McConnico
Defendant: Bluestone Coke LLC, Bluestone Coal Corp and Bluestone Resources Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Black Warrior River-Keeper, Inc et al v. Bluestone Coke, LLC
as 2:2023cv01211
Plaintiff: Black Warrior River-Keeper, Inc and GASP
Defendant: Bluestone Coke, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Coke v. Retirement Systems of Alabama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01104
Plaintiff: Edward M Coke
Defendant: Retirement Systems of Alabama, Director of Benefits Christopher Townes, Roy Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COKE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15152
Plaintiff: DON COKE
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coke v. City of Birmingham, Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00280
Plaintiff: Markus Coke
Defendant: City of Birmingham, Alabama, Birmingham Police Department and Zydeco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cokely v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00538
Petitioner: Travyuis D. Cokely
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cokely v. Thornton
as 4:2021cv01195
Petitioner: Donald Chadwick Cokely
Respondent: Drake Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cokely v. Smith
as 4:2021cv01194
Petitioner: Donald Chadwick Cokely
Respondent: Lucretia Battles Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cokely v. Scott
as 4:2021cv01196
Petitioner: Donald Chadwick Cokely
Respondent: Stedman Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?