Cases 1 - 8 of 8
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. U.S. Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv22034
Defendant:
U.S. Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers, Inc. , Premier Manufacturing, Inc. , Hobart Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
VIBO Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Guyton v. Thompson et al
as 1:2014cv03349
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Guyton, Jr.
Defendant:
John Thompson, Craig Phillips, DEA, et al. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks et al v. One Named Defense Counsel et al
as 6:2014cv00555
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Jadusingh
Defendant:
One Named Defense Counsel, United States Attorney, One Named AUSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chukwuma Azubuko v. Daniel Adams, et al
as 13-12036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL J. ADAMS, Boston Police Officer in individual and official capacity, DARREN SHERIDAN, Confidential Informant in individual and official capacity, TEN UNKNOWN BOSTON POLICE OFFICERS, in individual and official capacity and others
Quince v. West Palm Beach County Sheriff Department et al
as 9:2013cv80177
Plaintiff:
Courtney Bernard Quince
Defendant:
West Palm Beach County Sheriff Department, Scott McAndrew, D Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Sunrise Police Department et al
as 0:2009cv61550
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cruz
Defendant:
Sunrise Police Department, Confidential Informant and Sergio Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Granda v. Amion et al
as 1:2009cv21650
Plaintiff:
Paulino Granda
Defendant:
Richard D. Amion, Robbery Bureau, Robert Christie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Armstrong et al
as 8:2008cv01476
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Phelps
Defendant:
R. Armstrong, Confidential Informant, FNU Frangioni and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
