Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Cochran v. Burks et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Cadet D. Burks, Deputy L. Cochran and Strike Officer Hollie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Burks et al
as 1:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Cadet D. Burks, Deputy L. Cochran, Strike Officer Hollie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv03057
Plaintiff:
Valancia Goodman and Gregory Maloy
Defendant:
Sheriff/Chief Deputy Levon Allen, Chief Deputy / Sheri Roland Boehrer, Jail Adminisrator Terrance Gibson and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Jail Officer F. Radford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BURKE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06427
Plaintiff:
RICKY D BURKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84338
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY D. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv06601
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP D BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURKE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv59028
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP D BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moran v. Burks
as 1:2018cv03285
Defendant:
Officer D. Burks
Plaintiff:
Kevin Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Louis
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC, E. L. Shipp, L. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sobral v. Burke et al
as 1:2011cv24455
Plaintiff:
Carlos Sobral
Defendant:
Edmund Burke, Suzanne D. Burke and PRNUSA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
