Cases 1 - 10 of 13
CARROLL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18183
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARROLL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carroll et al v. 3M Company Inc
as 5:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
David Carroll and Stephanie Wells
Defendant:
3M Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Carroll v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv17178
Plaintiff:
David Carroll
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARROLL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv48249
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARROLL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv16788
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARROL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00532
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
David Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CARROLL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87855
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARROLL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv54178
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVID CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
LOPEZ-CANADA v. CARROLL
as 5:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO LOPEZ-CANADA
Defendant:
DAVID CARROLL and ASHLEY LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
