Cases 1 - 10 of 503
Arce v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 0:2024cv61677
Plaintiff:
Carlos L. Arce
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Hill v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2024cv00536
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Reginald W. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00746
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Washington Jr et al v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2024cv03590
Defendant:
President of United States, Department of Veterans Affairs, Georgia Govenor and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Swain Washington Jr and AW Washington Consulting LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-12470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HUTTON v. US DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, et al
as 3:2024cv00055
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES and US DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Plaintiff:
RONALD HUGH HUTTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cohen v. Department of Veteran Affairs
as 9:2024cv80706
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs
Plaintiff:
Glenn Scott Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Price v. The Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
SUSAN PRICE
Defendant:
The Department of Veterans Affairs, TODERICK O BRYANT, DAVID MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
