Cases 1 - 10 of 7,081
SHEWMAKER et al v. YARDI SYSTEMS INC et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Defendant:
BALACIANO GROUP, YARDI SYSTEMS INC, ALCO MANAGEMENT INC and others
Plaintiff:
MADISON SHEWMAKER and JAMAAR FAISON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
New Residential Borrower 2022-SFR2, LLC v. Bateman et al
as 1:2024cv02478
Plaintiff:
New Residential Borrower 2022-SFR2, LLC
Defendant:
Adrian Bateman, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gray et al v. Crete Carrier Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Calinda Gray, Honestee Gray and Carolyn Green
Defendant:
Crete Carrier Corporation and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Property Damage (P.I.)
Resendiz v. Christian et al
as 1:2024cv02452
Plaintiff:
Diana Resendiz
Defendant:
Officer Demetrius Christian, Clayton County, Georgia and John Doe(s) 1-3
ADAN v. DOE
as 1:2024cv02432
Petitioner:
Saleeban Isse Adan
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Adams et al
as 6:2024cv00028
Defendant:
Ms. Rylee, Brian Adams, McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrekus Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HURST et al v. BOSTON PLACE PROPERTY, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
ELBERT HURST and ALICE HURST
Defendant:
BOSTON PLACE PROPERTY, LLC and JOHN/JANE DOE, ADMINISTRATOR OR EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHNNY NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Oliveira v. Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02442
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Oliveira
Defendant:
Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc. and Jane Doe
Wang & Gao Family Trust et al v. TA Partners LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02446
Plaintiff:
Wang & Gao Family Trust, Lingyun Gu, Jingbo Xiao and others
Defendant:
TA Partners LLC, TA Partners Apartment Fund II LLC, Chienshen (Johnny) Lu and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
