Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Bridges v. Ward et al
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Bridges
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Warden Walter Berry, Eric Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
ERIC MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12906
Plaintiff:
ERIC MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eric MatthewsIn re: Eric Matthews
as 23-10293
Petitioner:
In re: ERIC MARTIN MATTHEWS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10725
Plaintiff:
ERIC MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HILL v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
OTIS HILL, JR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN, WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH, UNIT MANAGER KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AIMERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09537
Plaintiff:
ERIC MARTIN AIMERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILLIAMS v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN WALTER BERRY, ERIC MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUMMINGS v. BERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WARDEN BERRY WALTER, DEPUTY ERIC MARTIN, CHIEF CONSELOR WHIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN, CHIEF COUNSELOR PRETRILLION WHIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
