Cases 1 - 10 of 203
Larry White, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10739
Petitioner:
LARRY FELTON WHITE, JR.
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
West Side Property Management v. Felton
as 1:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
West Side Property Management
Defendant:
Latifa S. Felton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Fox et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01716
Plaintiff:
Robert Fox, Thomas Elsberry, William English and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Felton v. Premium Plumbing, LLC
as 8:2023cv02250
Plaintiff:
Andrentae Felton
Defendant:
Premium Plumbing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FELTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15254
Plaintiff:
COREY FELTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FELTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09906
Plaintiff:
BLAKE FELTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FELTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02755
Plaintiff:
JAMES L FELTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FELTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00500
Plaintiff:
ADAM FELTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
