Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02427
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26407
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26325
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gomez v. Roofing Plus, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv00367
Plaintiff:
Fernando Reyes Gomez
Defendant:
Roofing Plus, Inc. and Brendan Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DeLa Torre v. Warden of Krome SPC et al
as 1:2026cv26231
Plaintiff:
Fernando Bruto DeLa Torre
Defendant:
Warden of Krome SPC, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62455
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Willians Alvarado-Vasquez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 26-13037
Petitioner:
WILLIANS FERNANDO ALVARADO-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv25849
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
