Cases 1 - 10 of 15
NUNEZ v. LEAVINS et al
as 4:2021cv00101
Defendant:
MAXIE, JOHN DOE #20, BISHOP and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN NUNOZ and JONATHAN NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wagner v. Alegria Investments LLC et al
as 6:2020cv01059
Defendant:
Prince Tadros LLC, Alegria Investments LLC and Prince Tadros LLC doing business as Molly Hatchet's Sub Shop
Plaintiff:
Tavia Wagner
Bradley v. Hart et al
as 5:2013cv00127
Plaintiff:
Shannon Bradley
Defendant:
Hart, Security Threat Group Administration, Hutchson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Hatchet
as 6:2013cv01388
Plaintiff:
Santonio Meyers
Defendant:
Sgt. Hatchet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jemel Stone
as 12-11901
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEMEL STONE, a.k.a. Satin Stone, a.k.a. Teddy Blaze, a.k.a. Satin Marshall, a.k.a. Derrick Volt, a.k.a. John Hatchet, a.k.a. Freddie Reese, a.k.a. B
SWANN v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2011cv00500
Plaintiff:
STACEY LEE SWANN, DANIEL YOUNG, Michael Williams and others
Defendant:
CARL HUMPHREY, WILLIAM POWELL, VICTORIA MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2011cv00922
Plaintiff:
Nanya Sa'ud El HatChet Atta Bey
Defendant:
The State of Georgia and Cobb County Judicial Circuit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2011cv00532
Plaintiff:
Nanya Sa'ud El HatChet Atta Bey
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Cobb County Judicial Circuit, Melodie H. Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nanya Sa'ud Bey v. State of Georgia Inc., et al
as 11-10586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NANYA SA'UD EL HATCHET ATTA BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA INC., COBB COUNTY GOV. INC., COBB COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
