Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Sadler v. Mesa et al
as 5:2020cv00511
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Sadler and Salah Aldin Yussuf Ibn Ayyub
Defendant:
Florida Clinical Laboratories, Inc, Louis A. Vargas, FNU Hugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swain v. Weinstien et al
as 6:2020cv00082
Defendant:
Anthony Robbins, Alan Dershowitz, The Former Weinstein Company and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela D Swain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YASHARA'L v FRANCIS, et al
as 5:2019cv00441
Defendant:
PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP, BILL GATES, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
MOWRIYAH ABIYAH YASHARAL and MOWRIYAH ABIYAH YASHARA'L
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morton v. The President of The United States et al
as 1:2018cv25390
Defendant:
Nancy Raegan, Joe Biden, Bill Clinton and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy N. Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morton v. Clinton et al
as 1:2018cv25234
Defendant:
Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Nathan Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scotto v. Foster, et al
as 8:2018cv01830
Defendant:
Brickell Bank, United States Department of State, United Continental and others
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Souraya Faas v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 17-11381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOURAYA FAAS
Defendant - Appellee:
HILLARY CLINTON and DNC SERVICES CORPORATION
Ameen v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv04257
Plaintiff:
Lateefah Ameen
Defendant:
United States of America, The Whole State of Georgia that Provide Food or Business, Tauheedah Haadee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faas v. Clinton et al
as 1:2016cv24643
Plaintiff:
Souraya Faas
Defendant:
Hillary Clinton and Democratic Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Armstead v. Clinton et al
as 2:2016mc00016
Petitioner:
Brenda C. Armstead
Respondent:
Hillary Clinton, Ted Cruz and Jeb Bush
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
