Cases 1 - 10 of 352
OWENS v. DIXON et al
as 1:2024cv00185
Defendant:
C. CREWS, M. BARNES, LIEUTENANT D.C. PHILLIPS and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT T. OWENS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
HALE v. MSC Cruises S.A.
as 1:2024cv23404
Defendant:
MSC Cruises S.A.
Plaintiff:
NANCY HALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
HEARNS v. HALE et al
as 4:2024cv00295
Defendant:
FRANCES J ALLMEN, JONATHAN SJOSTROM and ROBERT C HALE
Plaintiff:
JULIUS L HEARNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00533
Petitioner:
Adam Hale
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lane et al
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Freddie J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lane, Hale, Lance Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALE v. HALE et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
RODRICK HALE
Defendant:
RENEE HALE, TERRENCE HALE, TERRY MITHELL, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaCerra v. Tony et al
as 0:2024cv60521
Plaintiff:
Gregory LaCerra
Defendant:
Gregory Tony, Broward Sheriff Office, John Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pinkans v. Hale et al
as 8:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Pinkans
Defendant:
Matthew B. Hale and Harley E. Riedel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hale v. Carnival Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv21047
Plaintiff:
Veronica Hale
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation doing business as Carnival Cruise Line and Travelex Shore Excursions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
