Cases 1 - 9 of 9
COCHRAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15145
Plaintiff:
KYLE J COCHRAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRUBBS v. COCHRAN et al
as 5:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
KEITH GRUBBS
Defendant:
WILLIAM COCHRAN, COCHRAN COACHWORKS, WILLIAM J COCHRAN and others
Smith v. Ivey et al
as 6:2019cv01410
Defendant:
Sergeant Moffit, Corporal Banks, Sergeant Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Lester Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv01352
Defendant:
Lt. K. Knight, P. Hunter, Nurse K. Burgin and others
Plaintiff:
William Hower Melendez, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cochran v. City of Atlanta, Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv00477
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Cochran
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Georgia and Kasim Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wanda Cochran v. The Gillette Co., et al
as 14-14221
Interested Party - Appellant:
WANDA J. COCHRAN
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSHUA D. POERTNER, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GILLETTE COMPANY and PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)
Christopher Batman, et al v. The Gillette Co., et al
as 14-13882
Interested Party - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BATMAN, THEODORE H. FRANK, ROBERT FALKNER and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSHUA D. POERTNER, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GILLETTE COMPANY and PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)
:
WENDY L. YOUNG, GRACE M. CANNATA, PAUL DORSEY and others
Legall v. Caring Angels, LLC et al
as 6:2008cv00242
Plaintiff:
Debbie Legall
Defendant:
Caring Angels, LLC and Gary J. Cochran
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WHITE v. HALL et al
as 3:2007cv00461
Plaintiff:
CAESAR WHITE, JR
Defendant:
WENDALL HALL, M E SEEVERS, PAUL CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
