Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Vannewhouse et al v. Effingham County Board of Commissioners et al
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Richard Tyler Vannewhouse and Richard Kirk Vannewhouse
Defendant:
Effingham County Board of Commissioners, Jimmy McDuffie, Deputy Zachary Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11244
Plaintiff:
JOHN MITCHELL MORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morris v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
John Taylor Morris, III
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Keith Harmon, Dareece Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99217
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Morris et al
as 4:2020cv00087
Defendant:
Officer Dabney, John P. Morris and Corporal Smalls
Plaintiff:
Darnell Lamar Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv70765
Plaintiff:
JOHN DEAN MORRIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv00103
Defendant:
B Smith, Stanley, Loveless and others
Plaintiff:
John M. Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Morris v. Judicial Circuit of Muscogee
as 18-12437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN A. MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF MUSCOGEE COUNTY
MORRIS v. TOMPKINS
as 4:2018cv00110
Petitioner:
JOHN ARTHUR MORRIS
Respondent:
DONNA TOMPKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MORRIS v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
JOHN ARTHUR MORRIS
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
