Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Jones et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Harold Edward Robertson, Robert Charles Robinson and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22185
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. ROBINSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv42810
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES L ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STRINGER v. ROBINSON et al
as 3:2020cv03587
Defendant:
Trane U.S. Inc., Gelco Fleet, James Clifton Robinson, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Culver et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00040
Plaintiff:
James L. Robinson
Defendant:
Lt. Jones, Jason Smoak, Ms. Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braddy v. Robinson
as 1:2019cv25140
Defendant:
James T. Robinson, The Trap Lounge and James T. Robinson doing business as Booby Trap Lounge also known as The Trap Lounge
Plaintiff:
Stacey Braddy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Robinson v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00922
Plaintiff:
James L. Robinson
Defendant:
Alcornelia Terry, Kay Ivey, Lynn Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Robinson v. Jefferson Dunn, et al
as 19-14520
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES L. ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON S DUNN, ANGELICA BLACK and ALCORNELIA TERRY
Braddy v. Robinson
as 1:2019cv22993
Defendant:
James T. Robinson and The Trap Lounge
Plaintiff:
Stacey Braddy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
