Cases 1 - 10 of 18
BRUCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08736
Plaintiff:
JAMES BRUCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRUCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17698
Plaintiff:
JAMES BRUCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hiscox Insurance Company Inc v. North Alabama Appliance LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00894
Counter Defendant:
Hiscox Insurance Company Inc
Cross Claimant:
North Alabama Appliance LLC and James Bruce Wiese
Defendant:
The Northfield Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BRUCE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36656
Plaintiff:
JAMES BRUCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruce v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 8:2020cv01971
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc., McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Bruce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James DeStephens v. Sadie Darnell, et al
as 19-11485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES BRUCE DESTEPHENS
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID DURDEN, Deputy, SADIE DARNELL, Sheriff of Alachua County Florida, CHRISTOPHER DASHER, Deputy and others
EDWARDS v. JONES ET AL
as 4:2018cv00555
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS TARON EDWARDS
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES, R ROSSELL, CENTURION HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2017cv02022
Plaintiff:
James Bruce Carroll
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DESTEPHENS v. DARNELL et al
as 1:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
JAMES BRUCE DESTEPHENS
Defendant:
SADIE DARNELL, DAVID DURDEN, CHRISTOPHER DASHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
