Cases 1 - 10 of 19
GILLESPIE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22574
Plaintiff:
JOHN CALVIN GILLESPIE, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAWES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15378
Plaintiff:
JOHN CALVIN DAWES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jah El et al v. City of Palm Beach Township et al
as 9:2022cv80733
Plaintiff:
Abraham K. Joh El, John Calvin Abraham and Abraham Kennedy Jah El
Defendant:
City of Palm Beach Township, Palm Beach Police Department, Victoria Suarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEAL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18155
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CALVIN NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. John Everett
as 19-11056
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN CALVIN EVERETT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EVERETT
as 1:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN CALVIN EVERETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Emerson Davis v. USA
as 17-12871
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EMERSON DAVIS, a.k.a. Mercy, a.k.a. John Calvin, a.k.a. Dred, a.k.a. Stanford Robinson
Mayo v. Capps et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00355
Plaintiff:
Andrea Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Christopher Capps, Maurice Alfonso Eggleston, John Calvin White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Eggleston et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
Andrea Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Maurice Alfonso Eggleston, Dana Horn Eggleston, John Calvin White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Everett v. USA
as 17-10251
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN CALVIN EVERETT
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
