Cases 1 - 10 of 5,334
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Devasko Lewis v. Warden
as 24-11502
Petitioner:
DEVASKO DEWAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
WARDEN, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Prison
MCKENZIE v. LEWIS
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
VERNON LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shipyard Villas Condominium Association, Inc. v. Clear Blue Speciality Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lewis Shipyard Villas Condominium Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Clear Blue Speciality Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Lewis, M.D. v. Hospital Corporation of American (HCA) et al
as 2:2024cv14147
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lewis, M.D.
Defendant:
Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) Florida Lawnwood Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ferguson Sr. v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv02097
Plaintiff:
King B.M. Ferguson Sr. and Blaane A. Oteo
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Charles Mims, Richard Timothy Hamil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00905
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
JORDAN v. WARD et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANK JORDAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, SHARON LEWIS, DR AYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. United States Of America
as 4:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Dontray Lewis
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Robert MorganIn re: Robert Morgan
as 24-11470
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT LEWIS MORGAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
