Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Phipps v. Lewis et al
as 1:2023cv05511
Plaintiff:
Tony Lavale Phipps
Defendant:
Judge Chaundra D. Lewis, Lynne M. Policaro, Pamela M. Bettis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LISTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LISTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haynes v. Burnham, et al
as 3:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lorenzo Haynes, Jr
Defendant:
C Burnham, T Lister, Sgt. E. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. City of Eastman, GA et al
as 3:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Lister Harrell
Defendant:
City of Eastman, GA, Becky Sheffield, Wesley Dyal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randolph Cooper v. Shawn Lister, et al
as 23-11261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDOLPH CLAY COOPER
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAWN LUCAS LISTER, AARON GLASS, ZACH KUIKEN and others
Lister v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv22261
Plaintiff:
Alice Lister
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
HAYNES v. BURNHAM et al
as 4:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY LORENZO HAYNES, JR
Defendant:
C BURNHAM, T LISTER, E MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LISTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04004
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY LISTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LISTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
DANIEL EARL LISTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maximo Gomez v. Steven Lister, et al
as 22-10808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAXIMO GOMEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN W. LISTER, JASON CARTER, SLATER WILLIAMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
