Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Daniels v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Ventress Correctional Facility, Karen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womack v. Philbin et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Womack
Defendant:
Warden Edwin Philbin, Ruthie Shelton, Dr. Alston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Anthony et al
as 1:2022cv03805
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jerome Miles
Defendant:
C/O Anthony, DW Mims, DW Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Rambo et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Anderson
Defendant:
Officer Rambo, Officer Cook, Officer Lett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Gordy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00054
Defendant:
Officer Jackson, Christopher Gordy and Lt. Walker
Plaintiff:
Gregory Anthony Anderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Nieves et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00359
Defendant:
P. Myers, Sgt Jordan, C. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Walker et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00390
Plaintiff:
Reggie Lee Duncan
Defendant:
Lt. Walker, Sgt. Lindsey, C.O. Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Walker et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00074
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bartholomew Clark
Defendant:
Lt. Walker, C.O. Dennis, Captain Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00740
Plaintiff:
Bryon Ray Phillips
Defendant:
Karla Jones , Lt. Walker , Lt. Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillilan et al v. Walker et al
as 5:2008cv00374
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gillilan
Defendant:
Lt. Walker, Sgt. Phillips, Sgt. Harper and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
