Cases 1 - 10 of 3,847
Morgan v. American United Life Insurance Company
as 8:2024cv01190
Petitioner:
Lisa Morgan
Defendant:
American United Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Reeves v. Pinellas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
William Morgan Reeves, III and Wally
Defendant:
Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, Pinellas County Courthouse, Pinellas County State Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. Barner et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Reginald Barner, Morgan Stephenson, Eric Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Griffin et al
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Griffin, Ballew, Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert MorganIn re: Robert Morgan
as 24-11470
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT LEWIS MORGAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Reyes v. Morgan & Morgan PA
as 0:2024cv60743
Plaintiff:
Iveliz Reyes
Defendant:
Morgan & Morgan PA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. JP Morgan Chase N.A.
as 8:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Gomez
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Morgan, Robert Lewis v. Osborne
as 1:2024cv21668
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis Morgan and Robert Lewis Morgan Jr.
Defendant:
Jonathan Kent Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albert St. Clair, Jr. v. DeAngelo Anthony, et al
as 24-11302
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ST. CLAIR, JR.
Defendant:
DEANGELO M. ANTHONY, DEREK R. GULLEDGE, ERIC STROM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
