Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Irina Collier v. Donald Trump, et al
as 24-10245
Plaintiff:
IRINA COLLIER
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
COLLIER v. DONALD TRUMP et al.,
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
IRINA COLLIER
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Stanley v. Ward et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Alvin Stanley
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Damon Hininger, Warden Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13450
Plaintiff:
MURPHY MORMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stanley v. Danforth et al
as 5:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Alvin Gamar Stanley
Defendant:
Warden Danforth, Warden Ricky Stone, Chief Malcom Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knighton et al v. Safe Haven Recovery, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv24030
Plaintiff:
James Knighton, Roshad Smiley, Michael Nesbitt and others
Defendant:
Safe Haven Recovery, Inc. and Luis De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CARTER v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
DARANTAE CARTER
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, DEPUTY WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CRUMBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61114
Plaintiff:
BILLY MORMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JAMES-MORMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50927
Plaintiff:
CARLA JAMES-MORMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. EMMONS et al
as 5:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
DARANTAE CARTER
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS, CHARLES MIMS, CRUMBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
