Cases 1 - 10 of 2,041
Jackson v. Viamonte et al
as 1:2024cv02297
Plaintiff:
Calvin Jackson
Defendant:
Mario Ericson Viamonte, New Life Carriers, Inc. and Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Louis, Jr. v. Tony et al
as 0:2024cv60866
Plaintiff:
Evans Marques Louis, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregory Tony, Mario A. Chavez Ruiz and Matthew Colominas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Cases
Tabraue et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv21231
Plaintiff:
Maria Tabraue and Mario Tabraue
Defendant:
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation, et al
as 24-11073
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
INTERMARK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, WILLIAM AUSTIN PRUITT, JACOB T. HAYES and others
Montanez v. Gagosian et al
as 5:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Mario Montanez
Defendant:
Steve Gagosian, Troy Stpiette and John/Jane Doe
Mario Manborde v. Attorney General, State of Florida
as 24-10843
Petitioner:
MARIO A. MANBORDE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mario Gomez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-11392
Petitioner:
MARIO GALO GOMEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Riveron v. Mystic Pointe Condominium No. Three Association, Inc.
as 1:2024cv21652
Plaintiff:
Mario Riveron
Defendant:
Mystic Pointe Condominium No. Three Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
RUSSAW v. TALTON et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARIO RUSSAW
Defendant:
CULLEN TALTON, ADA RODRIGO L SILVA, EDWARD D LUKEMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
