Cases 1 - 10 of 700
QBE Specialty Insurance Company v. CITY OF MIAMI et al
as 1:2024cv21854
Plaintiff:
QBE Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI, Joe Carollo, Arthur Noriega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Mendez v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01794
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Mendez
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Mendez v. Brown Davis Interiors, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv21396
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Mendez
Defendant:
Brown Davis Interiors, Inc., Todd D Davis and Robert S Brown
McCoy v. Flowers et al
as 6:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Idecheac A. McCoy
Defendant:
Mark Flowers, Deputy Nelson, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Peters v. Nienhuis et al
as 8:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Personal Representat Julia Anne Peters
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Nienhuis, Deputy Sharlene Carr, Corporal Robert Zasimovitch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
USA v. Christian Landeros Mendez
as 24-11102
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN JOSE LANDEROS MENDEZ
MENDEZ v. DISMAS CHARITIES, INC.
as 6:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
JOSE MENDEZ
Defendant:
DISMAS CHARITIES, INC.
Mendez Palacios, Gregori Jerson v. Heckard
as 0:2024cv60419
Plaintiff:
Gregori Jerson Mendez Palacios
Defendant:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
