Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Thomas v. Parnell, et al
as 3:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Michael F Thomas
Defendant:
Anthony G Parnell and Columbia County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. PARNELL et al
as 4:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F THOMAS
Defendant:
ANTHONY G PARNELL and COLUMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Morrison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Michael LeRoy Thomas
Defendant:
J. Morrison and P. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08080
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DARRELL THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24259
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DARRELL THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Thomas et al
as 1:2023cv03983
Plaintiff:
Dontavious Matthew Harris
Defendant:
Michael N. Thomas, Newton County Sheriff Office Employees, Medical Team/NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Morrison et al
as 2:2023cv01009
Petitioner:
Michael LeRoy Thomas
Respondent:
J Morrison and P Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Thomas
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Troup Co. Sheriff Dept, Dietian Donna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24878
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21760
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
