Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bayse v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Robbin Amanda Bayse and Robert Bayse
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Sharon Lewis, Jauel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv01291
Plaintiff:
Bryan L Jones and Vizion
Defendant:
Ms. Davis, Mr. Jones, Ms. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Barlow v. Warden, et al
as 22-12506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, Reidsville State Prison, MS. SHARPE, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison, MR. SPIN, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison and others
BARLOW v. BOBITT et al
as 7:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant:
Warden BOBITT, Ms SHARPE, Mr SPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAYSE v. WARD et al
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
ROBBIN AMANDA BAYSE and Robert Bayse
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Dr. Sharon Lewis, JAVEL JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fiorito v. Thompson et al
as 1:2020cv01682
Defendant:
Warden Woods, Ms. Winn, Mr. N. Grimes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Fiorito
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harmon v. Howell et al
as 7:2019cv01391
Defendant:
Pastor Chris Hodges, Sgt. Brown, Sheriff Denis Green and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treadwell v. Sellers et al
as 1:2018cv01741
Plaintiff:
DeAnthony Treadwell
Defendant:
Eric Sellers, Gregory C. Dozier, Ms. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Davis
as 2:2008cv14216
Plaintiff:
Eric B. Davis
Defendant:
Ms. Davis K.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joiner v. Marshall et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00386
Plaintiff:
Henry Joiner
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall, Gina M. Savage, Mrs. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
