Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Glover v. Marini et al
as 6:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Alexander Glover
Defendant:
Officer Taylor Marini, City of Orlando and Taylor Marini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullen v. Crook et al
as 6:2023cv01688
Plaintiff:
Octavias Sullen
Defendant:
Corporal Crook, Officer Gilliam, Corporal Sam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Odom et al
as 5:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Bennie James Johnson
Defendant:
Roy Odom, Cert Officer Todman, Cert Officer Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Dalton et al
as 3:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Shantricia Robinson
Defendant:
Officer Taylor Dalton, Officer John A. Stanish, Sergeant Brandon R. Kline and others
Tuten v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Nash Neubill Tuten
Defendant:
Shalena Cook Jones, Anthoney Burtow, The State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuten v. Karp et al
as 4:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nash N. Tuten
Defendant:
Judge Benjamin Karp, Sheriff John Wilcher, Deputy Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuten v. Skaff et al
as 4:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Nash N. Tuten
Defendant:
Officer Skaff, Capt. Scanz, Officer Geisler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuten v. Dustin et al
as 4:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Nash N. Tuten
Defendant:
Officer Belifore Dustin, State of Georgia District Attorney Office, Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuten v. CPT Seanz et al
as 4:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Nash N. Tuten
Defendant:
CPT Seanz, Officer Geisler, City of Savannah SPD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Connie Israel v. Taylor CI Warden, et al
as 22-11116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONNIE RAY ISRAEL
Defendant / Appellee:
TAYLOR CI WARDEN, CLASSIFICATIONAL OFFICE TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
