Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Jacoby v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00843
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Monica McCoy, Warden Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tovin Holdings, LLC v. Peavy et al
as 2:2020cv00247
Defendant:
Cecil E. Flowers, NLR-BB LLC d/b/a National Land Realty and Jacob Edward Peavy
Plaintiff:
Tovin Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Myers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00238
Defendant:
Warden Myers, Lt. Jones, Officer Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Prince Sayon Lenard Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peavy v. Monsanto Company
as 5:2019cv02066
Plaintiff:
Herman Peavy
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swearingen et al v. Juul Labs Inc et al
as 7:2019cv00779
Defendant:
Juul Labs Inc, Altria Group Inc and Phillip Morris USA Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Via Peavy and Elizabeth Ann Swearingen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Southern Insurance Company v. Peavy Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00385
Plaintiff:
American Southern Insurance Company
Defendant:
Peavy Construction Company, Inc., John R. Peavy and Kathleen Peavy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peavy et al v. Axelrod
as 2:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jacob E. Peavy and Katie L. Peavy
Defendant:
Barry Axelrod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peavy et al v. Axelrod
as 1:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jacob E. Peavy and Katie L. Peavy
Defendant:
Barry Axelrod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bales v. Corizon Medical Services Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00714
Plaintiff:
David H. Bales
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc., Jean Darbouze, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaser v. Borden et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00566
Plaintiff:
Terrance Reaser
Defendant:
Sgt Borden , Larry Peavy and Officer Keeton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
