Cases 1 - 10 of 188
FITZGERALD v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00190
Defendant:
DEWAYNE RENARD FITZGERALD, STATE COURT OF BIBB COUNTY, SHARELL F LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Atlanta Public Schools et al
as 1:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
Shirlene Jones
Defendant:
Atlanta Public Schools, Dr. Lisa Herring, Caroline Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Arris Canton LLC v. Pitts
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Arris Canton LLC doing business as The Indigo
Defendant:
Laportia Pitts
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
FORMAN v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE HOWARD FORMAN
Defendant:
NURSE MURPHY, NURSE PITTS and DECATUR COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Pitts et al
as 1:2023cv05222
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Rob Pitts, Joseph Young-Lincoln, Vral Glanville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BEY v. CARS R US OMG
as 5:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
SHATORIA K PITTS BEY
Defendant:
CARS R US OMG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IH6 Property Georgia, LP v. Pitts
as 1:2023cv04638
Plaintiff:
IH6 Property Georgia, LP
Defendant:
LaPortia Raeann Pitts
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PITTS v. MACON WATER AUTHORITY
as 5:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
SHATORIA K PITTS
Defendant:
MACON WATER AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hill v. Bernat et al
as 1:2023cv03618
Plaintiff:
Danielle Hill
Defendant:
Jennifer Bernat, David Portnoy, David Apelberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
