Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEBARR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2021cv00233
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE LEBARR
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, T CHILDREE, J BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41296
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY R HOLMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv26055
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holman Automotive Group, Inc. v. Black et al
as 0:2017cv61491
Plaintiff:
Holman Automotive Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas A. Black, Sean Redmann, Robert R. Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Coring, III v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Coring, III
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, S Wellhauser, Randall Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EPR Company, Inc. v. Pittsfield Plastics Engineering, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv61552
Plaintiff:
EPR Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Pittsfield Plastics Engineering, Inc., Thomas W. Walker, Duncan H. Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Holmes v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc
as 0:2009cv61435
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Holmes
Defendant:
Evergreen Helicopters, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Holmes v. Bessolo Design Group, Inc.
as 8:2009cv01131
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Holmes
Defendant:
Bessolo Design Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
