Cases 1 - 10 of 11
STEWART v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06014
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHANE STEWART
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STEWART v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22553
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. STEWART, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stewart v. Snider
as 1:2022cv00294
Petitioner:
Robert S Stewart, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America and S Snider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riddle v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00343
Plaintiff:
Dion Edward Riddle
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Ms. Banks, Kayla M. Albrition and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12833
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEWART v. SUPREME OIL COMPANY INC et al
as 1:2016cv00190
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E STEWART
Defendant:
SUPREME OIL COMPANY INC, STARR INDEMNITY LIABILITY COMPANY and CHRISTOPHER JEVON MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv08002
Petitioner:
Robert Franklin Stewart
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stewart v. USA
as 5:2015cv00432
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stewart v. Flournoy
as 2:2015cv00121
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Stewart
Respondent:
J.V. Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stewart v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00684
Plaintiff:
Robert Franklin Stewart
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, J. C. Giles, Alex Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
