Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Isaac Hayes Enterprises, LLC et al v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv03639
Defendant: Turning Point USA, Inc., National Rifle Association of America, Inc., Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: The Estate of Isaac Hayes and Isaac Hayes Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Disability Rights Florida, et al v. Secretary, State of Florida, et al
as 23-13727
Plaintiff / Appellant: DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and others
Defendant / Appellee: SECRETARY, STATE OF FLORIDA, SUPERVISOR, ELECTIONS FOR ALACHUA COUNTY, SUPERVISOR, ELECTIONS FOR BAKER COUNTY and others
In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202
as 23-13085
Plaintiff / Appellee: THE NEW GEORGIA PROJECT, BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, RISE, INC. and others
Intervenor: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Defendant / Appellant: GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, MATTHEW MASHBURN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR DOUGHERTY COUNTY and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE, JOHNNY VARNER, JACK NOA and others
In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202
as 23-13245
Plaintiff / Appellant: GEORGIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLE'S AGENDA, INC., LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Intervenor: NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Defendant / Appellant: GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, MATTHEW MASHBURN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR DOUGHERTY COUNTY and others
Raleigh Sutherland v. Save America Pac, et al
as 23-12150
Plaintiff / Appellant: RALEIGH SUTHERLAND
Defendant / Appellee: SAVE AMERICA PAC, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE and others
FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER et al v. LEE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00201
Defendant: LAUREL M LEE, CRAIG LATIMER, PENNY OGG and others
Plaintiff: UNIDOSUS, Poder Latinx, HISPANIC FEDERATION and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Amicus Curiae: District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VOTE.ORG et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff: VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defendant: CORD BYRD, KIM BARTON, CHRISTOPHER MILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE GEORGIA SENATE BILL 202
as 1:2021mi55555
Plaintiff: The New Georgia Project, Black Voters Matter Fund, Rise, Inc. and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan, David Worley and others
Intervenor Defendant: National Republican Congressional Committee and Republican National Committee
Amicus Curiae: Amicus Curiae, American Center for Law and Justice, Foundation for Government Accountability and others
Petitioner: District of Columbia, Public Interest Legal Foundation, Senator Max Burns and others
Not Classified By Court: Clerk of the Superio Debra DeBerry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vote.org et al v. Georgia State Election Board et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01734
Plaintiff: Vote.org, Georgia Alliance for Retired Americans and Priorities USA
Defendant: Georgia State Election Board, Edward Lindsey, Janice W. Johnston and others
Intervenor Defendant: Georgia Republican Party Inc. and Republican National Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUTHERLAND v. SAVE AMERICA PAC et al
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff: RALEIGH SUTHERLAND
Defendant: SAVE AMERICA PAC, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?