Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Averett v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv00406
Plaintiff:
Corry Averett
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, Betty Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rathke v. Dyer et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00923
Defendant:
Teresa Dyer, Heath Taylor and Lt. Johnson
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Rathke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyce v. Peavy (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00663
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Boyce
Defendant:
Larry Peavy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMC Diagnostic and Medical Clinic, P.C. v. Medical Protective Insurance Company
as 1:2014cv00567
Plaintiff:
IMC Diagnostic and Medical Clinic, P.C. , Roger M. Alvarado , Joseph Amato and others
Defendant:
Medical Protective Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Medical Protective Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Roger M. Alvarado , Joseph Amato , Patricia Burch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomason v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2014cv01725
Plaintiff:
Richard W Thomason
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hornsby v. Harris et al
as 6:2012cv01651
Plaintiff:
Gary Hornsby
Defendant:
Richard W Harris, James Whitman and Roger Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Harris et al
as 6:2012cv00264
Plaintiff:
Terry Jerome Green
Defendant:
Richard W Harris and Brian Lolley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pagan v. Harris et al
as 6:2011cv04046
Plaintiff:
Roberto J. Pagan, III
Defendant:
Richard W. Harris, Shaun Kelly, Wes Brown and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Harris et al
as 6:2011cv04047
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Smith
Defendant:
Richard W Harris, James Whitman, Roger Hayes and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
