Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Johnson v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv17303
Plaintiff:
Ricky Johnson
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40934
Plaintiff:
RICKY JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77336
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv28501
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICKIE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv25960
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Krishna Associates, LLC et al
as 6:2017cv00788
Plaintiff:
Ricky Johnson
Defendant:
Cumberland Gulf Group of Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Mann et al
as 1:2015cv02464
Petitioner:
Ricky Johnson
Respondent:
Jeffery L. Mann, Cynthia J. Becker, Phillip R. Peacock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rollins v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv02991
Plaintiff:
Danielle Deaton Rollins
Defendant:
Ricky Johnson, Darryl Henderson and Anthony Volley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON et al v. FRITO LAY INC
as 5:2014cv00093
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE WATSON , CHRISTOPHER MELTON , RANDY HORTON and others
Defendant:
FRITO LAY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. City of Priceville et al
as 5:2013cv02036
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Ricky Johnson, II
Defendant:
City of Priceville and Steve Haddick
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
