Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Al-Khalifa v. Ashcroft et al
as 1:2012cv03433
Plaintiff:
Oluwashina Ahmed Al-Khalifa
Defendant:
John Ashcroft and Rosemary L. Melville
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01320
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Li v. Melville et al
as 1:2007cv02989
Plaintiff:
Yang Li and Yang Li
Defendant:
Rosemary L. Melville, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Feldman v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2007cv01246
Plaintiff:
Maxim Feldman
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Rosemary L. Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Lim v. Melville et al
as 4:2007cv00962
Petitioner:
Veth Lim
Respondent:
Rosemary L Melville, David Venturella and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Petrenko v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv00047
Plaintiff:
Alexey B. Petrenko
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilo Gonzalez and Rosemary L. Melville
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Garcia v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00849
Plaintiff:
Victor Garcia
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ruiz et al v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00848
Plaintiff:
Raul Ruiz
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Inu-Umoru v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2007cv00841
Petitioner:
Abu Inu-Umoru and Abu Inu-Umoru
Respondent:
Emilio T. Gonzalez and Rosemary L. Melville
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
