Cases 1 - 10 of 12
RUSHTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02407
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUSHTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUSHTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15809
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AMBER RUSHTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rushton v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 1:2018cv24317
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Turman Trent Rushton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edwards et al v. The City of Sky Valley Georgia et al
as 2:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
Lisa Edwards , Stanley C. Rushton, Jr. and Madeleine Marie Taylor
Defendant:
The City of Sky Valley Georgia , Hughel Goodgame and Robert Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rushton v. Shulkin
as 1:2017cv00171
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Rushton
Defendant:
David J. Shulkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Progressive Premier Insurance Company of Illinois v. Bejar et al
as 2:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Progressive Premier Insurance Company of Illinois
Defendant:
Sandra Bejar , Edevaldo Lamacchia , JS Maid Cleaning Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010mc03293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rushton v. Eye Consultants of Bonita Springs
as 2:2010cv00357
Plaintiff:
Virgina Rushton
Defendant:
Eye Consultants of Bonita Springs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
