Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fisher et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
John T. Fisher, III, Annie S. Fisher, Sara D. Murray and others
Defendant:
Abner Smith, Jonathan Kasper, Dana Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
HINES v. THRASHER et al
as 4:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S HINES
Defendant:
JOHN THRASHER, ANGELA CHONG, RICHARD WOTTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. JONES et al
as 3:2015cv00500
Petitioner:
RODERICK S HINES, JR
Respondent:
M L JONES, D L CREWS, E L HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. JONES et al
as 1:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
RODERICK S HINES, JR
Defendant:
M L JONES, D L CREWS, E L HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chukwuma Azubuko v. Jane Haggerty, et al
as 12-12541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE S. HAGGERTY, Individual and Offical Capacities, GERALDINE S. HINES, Individual and Official Capacities, JAMES H. VAN DYKE, Attorney, Individual and Official Capacities and others
Chukwuma Azubuko v. Walter Timilty, et al
as 12-10753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTER F. TIMILTY, KENNETH FISHMAN, UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES and others
Azubuko v. Timilty et al
as 1:2011cv23862
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E Azubuko
Defendant:
Walter F. Timilty, Kenneth J. Fishman, Three Unknown Employees of Norfolk Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Azubuko et al v. Haggerty et al
as 1:2011cv23332
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E Azubuko and Precious Okereke
Defendant:
Jane S Haggerty, Geraldine S Hines, James H Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hines v. Woodfield Country Club Homeowners Association, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv61565
Plaintiff:
Lincoln S. Hines, Sr.
Defendant:
Woodfield Country Club Homeowners Association, Inc., The Country Club At Woodfield, Inc. and Woodfield Country Club
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
