Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Emery v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv08033
Petitioner:
Steven Lewis Emery
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SCOTT v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 4:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LEWIS SCOTT
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Steven Emery
as 20-13888
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN LEWIS EMERY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv53933
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv39235
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32629
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STEVEN LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAINT v. RECORD et al
as 5:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Bay District Schools School Board, Steven Lewis Record, Mike Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick A Saint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv23953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04927
Plaintiff:
Steven Lewis
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lionel Richardson, et al v. Governor of Georgia, et al
as 14-12820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIONEL RICHARDSON, NA'MIER T, age 5 and JAY'VON T, age 3, all others simularly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA, WALKER COUNTY FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES, CLYDE L. REESE, III and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
