Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HODGES III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv36065
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE T HODGES III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hodges v. United States Of America
as 5:2017cv00029
Petitioner:
Cortez T. Hodges
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cooper v. King, Esq. et al
as 3:2016cv00537
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cooper
Defendant:
Alex King, Esq. and Julie T Hodges, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Forester v. Dixon, et al
as 16-10636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ALLEN FORESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
DIXON, A Shift Rover for Seg. Unit, GUTHERY, A Shift Rover for Seg. Unit and BRUCE T. HODGE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Michael Oliver v. Lemon, et al
as 13-15541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DARNELL OLIVER
Defendant - Appellee:
LEMON, Correctional Officer, DAVENPORT, Assistant Warden, CHAPMAN, C.O. and others
Oliver v. Lemon et al
as 2:2013cv01987
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Lemon, Bruce T Hodge, Davenport and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge v. Green Sense, LLC
as 3:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Roe T. Hodge
Defendant:
Green Sense, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Green Sense, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Roe T. Hodge
Forester v. Hodges et al
as 4:2012cv04094
Plaintiff:
James Allen Forester
Defendant:
Bruce T. Hodges, Officer Dixon and Officer Guthery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges et al v. King America Finishing, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00073
Plaintiff:
Cynthia D. Hodges , Dan R. Taulbee , Remer D. Clifton and others
Defendant:
King America Finishing, Inc. , Westex Holding Co. and Michael Albert Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
