Cases 1 - 10 of 22
EDWARDS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22223
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T EDWARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GREEN v. EDWARDS et al
as 5:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
MONTRELL D GREEN
Defendant:
JONES, T EDWARDS and S MIDDLEBROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19061
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv15457
Plaintiff:
VAN T EDWARDS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Radical v. Atlanta Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv04530
Defendant:
Officer T. Edwards, Atlanta Police Department, Officer D. Fambro and others
Plaintiff:
Eryk Radical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. TERRY, et al
as 5:2018cv00435
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, DEPUTY T EDWARDS, DEPUTY ANTHONY TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY BANKS, III, LAVERNE JOHNSON and TAVARIS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. TOWNSEND et al
as 4:2018cv00422
Defendant:
J E FEAD, R OLIVER, J P ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT T OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Adger et al
as 1:2016cv04797
Plaintiff:
Deontae Brooks
Defendant:
Mark Adger, T. Edwards, F. Hollins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. United States of America
as 6:2016cv01188
Petitioner:
Zechary T. Edwards
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Edwards et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv22663
Plaintiff:
Douglas T. Edwards and Mobile World View Technologies, Innovations, Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc. , Harshaw Research, Inc., Dale J Ream and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
