Cases 1 - 10 of 5,370
Saxton v. Perry
as 4:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Terry Saxton
Defendant:
J. Kevin Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tuten v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Terry Burdette Tuten
Defendant:
Warden, Salyard, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. BERNARD
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Tavarres Henderson and Juhiiv Ali Muhammed
Respondent:
Mr Terry Bernard
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. BERNARD
as 4:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
TAVARRES HENDERSON and JUHIIV ALI MUHAMMIED
Respondent:
TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD, et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD and TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Western Sizzlin Corp. v. Family Tradition Steak House, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Western Sizzlin Corp.
Defendant:
Family Tradition Steak House, Inc., Terry D. Nickell and Kimberly Nickell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
REDMOND et al v. DUPREE et al
as 5:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE REDMOND and JENNIFER THOMAS
Defendant:
ANTHONY DUPREE, CHRISTIAN MAKALIN TURNER, GARY LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Henderson v. Bernard et al
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Tavarres Henderson
Defendant:
Mr Terry Bernard and State of Georgia Pardons & Paroles Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
