Cases 1 - 10 of 17,565
Daniel v. U.S. Post Office
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Steven Gibbons v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11148
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GIBBONS
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC., WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS U.S. INC and REEDY CREEK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ronald Scherer v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., et al
as 24-11874
Plaintiff:
RONALD EARL SCHERER
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO. 7.00% CAPITAL SECURITIES SERIES J, JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Boroughf v. Renaissancere Specialty U.S. LTD.
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
William Boroughf
Defendant:
Renaissancere Specialty U.S. LTD.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
