Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Lee v. U.S. Dept. of Justice
as 1:2024cv00984
Petitioner:
Sung Min Lee
Respondent:
U.S. Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Gueye v. Android et al
as 9:2023cv80463
Plaintiff:
Amar Gueye
Defendant:
Android, T-Mobile, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
McFadden v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Tyriquez L. McFadden, TYREE MCFADDEN and McFadden Tyriquez Lequan
Defendant:
United States of America, BOP, James Christian Stuchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hunt v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 5:2020cv00489
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
U.S. Dept of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bush v. United States Government et al
as 1:2016cv04067
Plaintiff:
Thomas K. Bush
Defendant:
United States Government, President Barack Obama, Loretta Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00351
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peeples v. U.S. Dept. of Justice et al
as 5:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Joe Wallace Peeples, III
Defendant:
U.S. Dept of Justice and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Kalu v. Morales et al
as 1:2014cv21441
Plaintiff:
John Oscar Kalu
Defendant:
Fernando Morales, Rojo M., Edilia Surman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
