Cases 1 - 10 of 26
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. US Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Boykin
Defendant:
US Postal Service and Jarvis Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duffy v. United States Postal Service et al
as 8:2023cv02891
Plaintiff:
John T. Duffy
Defendant:
US Postal Service, Thomas Magilligan, Robert Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duffy v. United States Postal Service et al
as 8:2023cv02893
Plaintiff:
John T. Duffy
Defendant:
US Postal Service, Edward Haab, Thomas Magilligan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
JOSEY v. US POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2023cv24713
Plaintiff:
ANTON J JOSEY
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
IZAGUIRRE et al v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
DAVID IZAGUIRRE and JACKELINE CLEMENTS
Defendant:
SANDY WILLIAMS and US POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Borowski v. US Postal Service
as 2:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
Brook Lynn Borowski
Defendant:
US Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
LEWIS v US POSTAL SERVICE
as 4:2021cv00375
Plaintiff:
JERRY LEWIS
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ALFA Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Knox et al
as 5:2019cv01554
Plaintiff:
Mary Bowman and ALFA Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
US Postal Service and Seconda Sherrell Knox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Copeland v. US Postal Service
as 6:2018cv00892
Plaintiff:
Karen Margaret Copeland
Defendant:
US Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
