Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Johns et al v. Perignat
as 2:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Lanett H. Johns, Laura M. Riley, Christine M. Polmanteer and others
Defendant:
Melissa Perignat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Smith et al v. USAA Federal Saving Bank
as 1:2023cv04470
Plaintiff:
William C. Smith and William C. Smith, III
Defendant:
USAA Federal Saving Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15469
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C SMITH SR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv03035
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05452
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PHILLIP SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24573
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JON SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C SMITH
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ward et al
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
William David Smith
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Warden Brian Chambers and Warden Antoine Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16369
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NEAL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
